
A friend said this to me over dinner last Thursday. Playing off the always-controversial home-school option, he was describing his distaste with his current church's programming and missiology.
He went on to elaborate about the importance of his children to be part of a larger community and to take part in something bigger than themselves. There is something valuable, he feels, about being a part of a growing and vibrant community that takes seriously the teachings of Jesus to feed the hungry, give to the poor and love your neighbor.
But he wasn't finding it in the church he has called home for the last few years. Somewhere along the path to fatter membership rolls, the church began to embrace circus-like sensationalism and has lost its focus on being a refuge to the broken. In place of sacrifice is now a gospel of entertainment, an ethic of power, and a mentality of isolation. And it was no place he wanted to raise his kids.
Lost in this sea are countless others – individuals, families, teenagers, the elderly. Some have been Christians all their lives, and others are too nervous to explore what a life of discipleship might really look like. But, all may identify with the value of planting trees they will never sit under, and giving to something that only can be birthed by collective action.
And it's always easier to sit and watch. It's easier to not go to church than it is to go; it's easier to not call that person you wish you knew better than it is to pick up the phone and ask the questions that lead to deeper friendship; and it's always easier to shout from the sidelines than to get in the game. But deep down inside, we all want to play. We all long for real community – the kind that says, "You're going through that? Me, too. But hey, if we walk through this together, we just might make it." They, we, I – all of us – long for authenticity. We yearn for people we can be ourselves around. We desperately want people to look at our faults and not cover their eyes in pity. We want other broken souls to eat with, to dance with, to @!$%# with, to cry with, and to laugh with.
But it's still so hard. My brilliant wife told me soon after we met that the price of intimacy is reckless abandonment. In our culture that rarely prizes vulnerability, community – true and lasting community – is only birthed through deliberate risk.
How do we create this?
We've got to value the baby steps. We've got to cheer on those among us willing to open their homes, their wallets, their hearts and their ears in the name of community. We've got to commit, little by little, to the rising tide that comes with repeated interaction. We've got to grab our surfboard and ride that wave until it crashes on the shore of deep communion. And then we'll sit in the sand and build castles with our friends until it's time to splash in the scary surf once more.
Walking hand in hand, we all arrive at the destination of meaningful community together. And there will be no distinction between home-churching and churching our kids, for we will BE the church. We will have freed the old institution from its oft thought of role as a place and we will be the ones we have been waiting for.
This is a beautiful essay. Thank-you Sam Davidson. I have been working with a church, Covenant Community Church in Louisville, KY for the past five years that has embraced learning to be community for one another as a core value. Sometimes it's a lot of fun (we have great parties) and other times it's difficult (we speak honestly to each other and offer challenges when appropriate). We've learned that it is not always easy to live in Christian community, but it is absolutely necessary if we want to do the hard work of ministry and justice.
Very well written. I would encourage your friend to contact his church leadership and discus his views with them. Maybe he could get involved in (or help start) a small group ministry in his church.
This is a wonderful piece and quite inspiring. The ride from your rising tide, to the splashing surf, is as beautiful as anything I have heard in a long time. Thank you for sharing and remember everywhere you reach out gently positive waves travel and touch others even if it can't always be seen. Thanks for the positive wave, I'll pass it on.
Very good article. I used to be involved in church community events and such as a kid, and even as I grew apart from the church I kept fairly involved if the cause was good. I think "home churching" children is actually a better alternative in a lot of cases, and organizing community helping activities with the people of the community without necessarily a church directly involved, although it's nice to start with that centralization for sure. I've always liked helping out community based things....church or not. I'm obviously bias in a way because of my beliefs to lean towards groups not centered around a church....but really if it's getting a good job done, power to them.
I'm a Christian and this is the main reason why I don't attend "Church". Great essay, good sir.
Very well written piece.
I'm a bit alarmed at seeing churches which must have cost millions of dollars to construct. I am not a Christian but I suspect that luxury is not a core tenet of worship nor is it a necessity to doing so successfully.
I think a little less comfort and a stronger focus on community would go a long way in making me trust in the ideals of the "church" as an organization.
Any spiritual ideals you wish to impart to your child can be accomplished just as easily at home.
I'm a bit alarmed at seeing churches which must have cost millions of dollars to construct. I am not a Christian but I suspect that luxury is not a core tenet of worship nor is it a necessity to doing so successfully.
Spot on, Brian.
Well, if you believe that the church is the house of God (and if not, why would you build a church?), then certainly you'd want to make a nice place for Him.
Also, to paraphrase Lenny Bruce, if I live in a dump, why would I want to go worship in a dump? ;-)
Any spiritual ideals you wish to impart to your child can be accomplished just as easily at home.
Bang on. Anyone who expects an institution alone to give their children a sense of morals is being shortsighted. Your kids will pick it up better if you not only practice your faith, but talk with them about it.
Spiritual training can and should happen at home, but I think Sam's article goes beyond that. Sam can correct me if I missed it (I don't want to misrepresent him or his article), but my interpretation of the article follows.
The Bible calls the church to be a community. This is often difficult and it may sometimes be easier to "home-church" our families than deal with the problems and failings of our churches. But if we make the effort to reach out to each other and commit ourselves to creating the community that God has called us to there will be a beautiful result which will eliminate the distinction between home-churching and churching because we will be the church.
I don't see Sam's article saying we should abandon the church in favor of home-churching. I read it as an encouragement to bring true community to the church and eliminate the need for a distinction.
Great topic. In an age of extremist hate, we need extremist love. Can I love Jesus while sitting comfortably in my suburban couch? Ouch! This is the reason why my whole church is reading the book "Irresistible Revolution" by Shane Clairborne and "Velvet Elvis: Repainting the Christian Faith" by Rob Bell. I highly reccomend both of these books. They are causing a stir. Haven't been this stirred since I lost my TV remote. ;-)
This actually gives me an excuse to talk for a little bit about the ever-growing "house-church" movement. (it's not home-church, oddly enough).
The idea is to have church in someones home instead of at a church. Naturally, every thing's smaller, but that's just the beginning. Meetings are not on a rigorous agenda where there is no improvisation. Rather, the meetings are continuously changing, so they're never boring. Also, and very importantly: everyone in the house-church is involved in the house-church. You don't just go and sit down and listen to other people talk. You participate. Using whatever gift/skill/talent/whatever you may have, you share with the group however you want to. And here's two things that a lot of anti-church people may be glad to hear: there's no pastors (which means all the money donated to the church immediately goes to outreach), and there's no sermons (AKA nap-time). I'd encourage anyone who has gotten out of the church because of all the problems in them to check out house-churches... you might like what you see. (All of it's Biblically based, too, if anyone's interested)
In fact, just a couple weeks ago I left the church I had been going to for over 5 years and started a house church of my own. Been going well so far. :)
wow... the story ... I love it. :)
Here is another kind of new ministry - Shekinah Studio. These women are Disciples of Christ ministers who began a post-modern church in Louisville. They were nested in an established church but have recently moved into their own space - it's an old house that had been turned into a business and now into a spiritual gathering place. Covenant Community Church (mentioned above) uses the upstairs of Shekinah to house the Center for Integral Spirituality (heavily informed by the work of Ken Wilbur). It is a yoga and meditation studio with some meeting space and a place to host gatherings.
There are some many things happening with "the Church" these days -- it's a great time to be seeking a better understanding of faith and mystery.
Sam, I was particularly excited to see that you are pursuing an mdiv with a social justice focus. So many of the new churches out there lack a 'justice critique' in their approach to mission and evangelism (but that may be a conversation for another evening).
@ noah
I have been exploring various models of church leadership and I am interested to know more about your role in 'starting a church' if you are not the pastor. Do you serve more of an administrative function? Do people take turns leading discussion and hosting? Does anyone get paid? Do you use additional texts besides the Bible?
The flexibility of what you are doing is incredibly appealing and I would like to know more about your structure.
Glad to see some interest in it, merrydeath.
My role? I called up some people and told 'em to come to my house every week. :) That's about all I've done. The first time, just to educate everyone, I did more talking than usual just so everyone would understand the concept of housechurchs and how they operate. So honestly, I'm not exactly a "leader." No one is, really. So nobody gets paid, either.
As for leading discussion: if someone wants to bring a scripture that they've been reading, or maybe make some cool connections between different scriptures, we welcome/encourage that. It's not really that they would lead the discussion neccessarily, but more that they would share what's on their hearts and stir up a discussion among the group allowing everyone to participate and get something out of it.
But that's just one of the many things we do. Say someone feels like doing some worship, then we could stick in a CD and do some songs, or maybe someone brings a guitar, or maybe (just maybe) some has a good enough singing voice to start us off in song. It's all about a spirit-lead meeting where everyone is welcome to participate.
If you're really interested in doing this, I'd say pick up Megashift. It's a book that's been going around churches lately and is one of the more well-known books advocating house-churches. I'll admit that I haven't read it all, but it has a nice listing of the "19 things that can happen in a house church meeting." Helped my group get the mindset. If you'd like more reading, there's one other book that really good... can't remember the name right now, though.
Hope this helps.
Noah,
What you describe as house-churches sound very similar to what I've always referred to as small groups. The difference being that small groups supplement rather than replace traditional church services. Are you familiar with small group ministries? If so, can you explain the differences/similarities? I'm curious why you left your church vs. doing both.
If you'd like more reading, there's one other book that really good... can't remember the name right now, though.
Noah, I think the name of the book you're referring to is "The Bible".
(A little joke, with a background of truth to it :-)
Good observation, there. House-churches are very similar to small groups (also known as home groups, cell groups, etc.). And I suppose there's two differences here:
So while they're similar, they do have notable differences.
Dangitall... replied to the wrong thread, and I forgot to answer your last question. Oops. :) Simply, the reason I left the church was because it wasn't benefiting me at all. It has turned into for too political of a church where certain people had all the power. I wanted to participate in church, and house churches looked like they gave me that chance.
Noah, allow me to throw in another view on churches and home-churches. The idea of "church" that I have been associated with since I was born (my Dad's a "missionary" in an informal kind of way) is of a local group of Christians who have no affiliation to any other larger group. Whether they meet in houses, open-air, or halls, they are each just a simple group of Christians, autonomous, and not a part of a larger human organization.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |